Appeals court rules New Jersey assault weapons ban unconstitutional 88%

By Josh Kelety0%

7/18/2026, 12:43:30 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.2% saturation with 127 hits. Analysis detected 1,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 301 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 80.5% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,619 of 20,518 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the article peer group.

A federal appeals court has delivered a significant blow to New Jersey's gun control measures, ruling Friday that the state's prohibitions on assault firearms and magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds are unconstitutional. 
This landmark decision marks the first time a federal appeals court has invalidated a state ban on such weapons, arriving as the U.S. 
Supreme Court prepares to review whether similar bans on semi-automatic rifles infringe upon the Second Amendment. 
The ruling also stands in contrast to a decision just last week, where a different federal appeals court upheld Illinois' ban on semi-automatic weapons. 
However, the appeals court on Friday declared the state's entire ban on what it defines as "assault firearms" and its limitation on "large capacity ammunition magazines" to be unconstitutional. 
New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport, a Democrat whose office defended the challenged law, expressed strong disagreement with the outcome. 
In a statement, she called the decision "as unfortunate as it is legally incorrect." 
Davenport added, "Every other federal circuit court to consider the issue has come out the other way. 
Assault weapons and large capacity magazines play a dangerous role in the modern epidemic of mass shootings, and New Jersey acted reasonably and lawfully in restricting them. 
We are considering our options." 
Conversely, John Commerford, executive director of the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action, hailed the ruling as a "historic victory for the NRA, the Second Amendment, and law-abiding Americans." 
Commerford stated, "The Third Circuit has struck down these unconstitutional so-called assault weapons bans and magazine bans in New Jersey, affirming what we’ve always known: the right to keep and bear arms, including commonly-owned rifles and standard-capacity magazines, is fundamental and cannot be infringed by politicians who prioritize control over constitutional freedoms." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 17.3%Josh Kelety: 6.3%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias17.3%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.6%Josh Kelety: 10.4%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic16.6%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 1.3%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 42.2%Josh Kelety: 15.0%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect42.2%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 1.3%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.5%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Josh Kelety: 3.2%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias9.0%This article: 25.2%Josh Kelety: 21.5%The Independent: 12.1%Negativity Bias25.2%This article: 17.3%Josh Kelety: 5.7%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias17.3%This article: 6.6%Josh Kelety: 1.2%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error6.6%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 23.9%Josh Kelety: 12.5%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias23.9%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Josh Kelety: 4.0%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect10.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.0%Josh Kelety: 4.3%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias8.0%This article: 24.9%Josh Kelety: 4.6%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect24.9%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 6.3%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.0%Josh Kelety: 11.8%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority11.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 6.3%The Independent: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.0%Josh Kelety: 3.3%The Independent: 4.1%Hasty Generalization9.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 10.0%Josh Kelety: 3.9%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon10.0%This article: 27.2%Josh Kelety: 13.3%The Independent: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion27.2%This article: 17.3%Josh Kelety: 8.0%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question17.3%This article: 9.0%Josh Kelety: 1.6%The Independent: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 9.0%Josh Kelety: 1.6%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof9.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 1.5%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 17.3%Josh Kelety: 3.2%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman17.3%This article: 4.7%Josh Kelety: 0.9%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.7%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 17.3%Josh Kelety: 4.6%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote17.3%This article: 0.0%Josh Kelety: 1.6%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 23.9%Josh Kelety: 7.9%The Independent: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice23.9%This article: 9.0%Josh Kelety: 1.6%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination9.0%This article: 6.6%Josh Kelety: 1.2%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.6%This article: 27.2%Josh Kelety: 10.0%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias27.2%This article: 9.0%Josh Kelety: 1.6%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.0%

301 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers55%attributed speech136writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJennifer Davenport • 20 words • 100.0% coverageJennifer Davenport • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJennifer Davenport • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJennifer Davenport • 27 words • 100.0% coverageJennifer Davenport • 5 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Commerford • 30 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Commerford • 52 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

John Commerford

100%flagged-word coverage
82 attributed words50% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%John Commerford: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+63.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%John Commerford: 63.4%63.4%Biased Writer Voice-49.3 ptsWriter: 49.3%John Commerford: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.