Topic summary
69% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Weapons results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 1,629 hits . Analysis detected 11,367 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,723 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (9,958 of 16,562 topics). This Weapons is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Weapons
Topic details
Total words: 10,723
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.9% percentile 2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.2% 15.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst