Author summary
82% 16 analyzed articles/videos 14,325 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arya Sundaram results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 6,928 hits . Analysis detected 54,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 52,442 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,008 of 6,204 authors). This Arya Sundaram is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Arya Sundaram
Author details
Total words: 52,442
Article count: 16
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score16 analyzed articles52.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst