Gothamist77%

14-year old killed, another teen injured subway surfing across Williamsburg Bridge 4%

By Christopher Werth0% Arya Sundaram81%

5/23/2026, 2:54:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 110 faulty-reasoning hits from 230 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 17% and a BS Rank of 4% (21,152 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the article peer group.

One teenager was killed and another is in critical condition after falling from a J train while subway surfing across the Williamsburg Bridge, according to city officials. 
Police say officers responded to a 911 call just before 6 p.m. 
Friday. 
A 14-year old boy fell several stories from the bridge and into a lot near Delancey Street and Lewis Street. 
An 18-year old was found on the subway tracks on the bridge. 
Both were unconscious and responsive, an NYPD spokesperson said. 
Emergency responders transported the teens to Bellevue Hospital. 
The 14-year old was pronounced dead and the 18-year old is in critical condition. 
Their names are not being released pending family notification. 
“This is a preventable tragedy,” Mayor Zohran Mamdani said in a statement late Friday. 
“Subway surfing is deadly.” 
Yvette Boria, 59, said she was trying to cross the bridge when police and emergency personel responded and witnessed medics trying to assist the two teens. 
"We saw all the ambulances and police officers," Boria said. 
"Kids don't learn. 
Do they not realize what they're doing?" 
NYC Transit President Demetrius Crichlow issued a statement calling the incident “heartbreaking.” 
“I’m imploring families, friends, teachers and others coming into contact with teens engaging in these suicidal stunts to get them to stop.” 
This is a developing story that may be updated. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 1.6%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 4.9%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Christopher Werth: 6.2%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect9.6%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Christopher Werth: 7.8%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Christopher Werth: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error3.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Christopher Werth: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 3.0%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.0%Christopher Werth: 1.3%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization3.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.6%Christopher Werth: 6.4%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion9.6%This article: 3.0%Christopher Werth: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question3.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 1.6%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.9%Christopher Werth: 3.4%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.9%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 2.7%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 3.2%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 9.6%Christopher Werth: 8.2%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination9.6%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Christopher Werth: 0.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

230 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers47%attributed speech123writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageNYPD • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Zohran Mamdani • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMayor Zohran Mamdani • 4 words • 0.0% coverageYvette Boria • 26 words • 0.0% coverageYvette Boria • 10 words • 0.0% coverageYvette Boria • 3 words • 0.0% coverageYvette Boria • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDemetrius Crichlow • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDemetrius Crichlow • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Demetrius Crichlow

65%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words32% of attributed speech8.9% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Indoctrination+64.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Demetrius Crichlow: 64.7%64.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.