Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New-York-City results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 670 hits . Analysis detected 7,422 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,988 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 53% (7,562 of 15,771 topics). This New-York-City is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. New-York-City
Topic details
Total words: 5,988
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst