Author summary
84% 18 analyzed articles/videos 11,291 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Kim results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 7,201 hits . Analysis detected 49,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 47,320 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,101 of 6,162 authors). This Elizabeth Kim is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Elizabeth Kim
Author details
Total words: 47,320
Article count: 18
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score18 analyzed articles47.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.6% 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst