Author summary
0% 17 analyzed articles/videos 6,304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liam Quigley results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 3,867 hits . Analysis detected 33,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,918 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,880 of 6,270 authors). This Liam Quigley is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Liam Quigley
Author details
Total words: 37,918
Article count: 17
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score17 analyzed articles37.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst