Gothamist77%

Jacob Riis Bathhouse on track to reopen as private club by end of July 4%

By Liam Quigley0%

6/24/2026, 10:30:59 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Recency Bias, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 196 faulty-reasoning hits from 551 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 16.5% and a BS Rank of 4% (21,188 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the article peer group.

A long-abandoned building on one of New York City’s most popular beachfronts is set to begin reopening as a private club and hotel next month after an $88 million renovation that dragged on for nearly a decade. 
The Jacob Riis Bathhouse, which was built in 1932 by then-city Parks Commissioner Robert Moses, sat empty and dilapidated for more than half a century. 
It’s set to begin reopening this summer as the Rockaway Ocean Club. 
The building sits adjacent to Jacob Riis Park, also known as the “People’s Beach.” 
The private club plans to open in phases, starting the final weekend of July, with a pool available only to members who pay an annual fee starting at $1,000. 
That space will operate on Fridays and Sundays once it opens, alongside a public outdoor lounge area featuring mobile bars and a food truck. 
The developers also aim to open a 1,800-person concert venue and event space at the site this summer. 
The club also plans to roll out a beach shop facing the boardwalk alongside other limited concessions while it builds out the space’s main kitchen. 
Next summer, the club plans to unveil a 28-room hotel alongside a rooftop restaurant and lounge for guests and club members. 
The mobile food and drink options unveiled this summer should be replaced with a permanent bar and pizza shop accessible from the boardwalk. 
The future hotel space was a construction site during a tour on Tuesday. 
“It's like putting together a million-piece jigsaw puzzle with pieces that keep changing shape," said Ursula Damani, co-owner of the project, who’s been working to resurrect the bathhouse since 2017. 
"It's been boarded up and empty for 54 years. 
There are generations of people. 
This building has just been a ghost in the backdrop of family photos,” she said. 
Damani said that the club will offer free concerts and reasonably priced merchandise from its shops facing the boardwalk. 
She noted that the building has been fortified against future flooding, with all electrical systems above grade and a deployable “muscle wall” kept on site to redirect storm surges. 
Three years ago, the National Park Service closed parts of the beach directly outside the hotel after extreme erosion washed away thousands of tons of sand dumped there by the Army Corps of Engineers. 
Damani said the project won’t restrict beach access and that she doesn’t want visitors to the nearby “People’s Beach” to feel alienated by it. 
 New York City is such an incredible tapestry of people and personalities, and creating a space for people to come and feel welcome, and it, it'll be self-vetting,” she said. 
"If people don't feel there's a place, then I respect that, you know? 
But my hope is that they at least come and give us a try and get to know us.” 
Rockaway resident Stefan Goldberg, 32, said he has walked by the structure for years, wondering what was going on behind the construction fences. 
 I'm actually happy they're doing something about it, because I was always in my head, I'm always thinking, ‘What was this?’” 
Goldberg said. 
The nearest hotel on the peninsula is the Rockaway Hotel, which opened in 2020, a few of miles down the beach. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 2.2%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 4.8%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Liam Quigley: 10.2%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%Liam Quigley: 5.5%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Liam Quigley: 8.7%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 2.9%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 2.0%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Liam Quigley: 1.0%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%Liam Quigley: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 4.6%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 2.2%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 1.0%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 4.4%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 1.0%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 8.0%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 3.5%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 2.9%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.6%Liam Quigley: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.6%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 3.7%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Liam Quigley: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

551 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers26%attributed speech407writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageUrsula Damani • 30 words • 0.0% coverageUrsula Damani • 9 words • 0.0% coverageUrsula Damani • 5 words • 0.0% coverageUrsula Damani • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageUrsula Damani • 31 words • 0.0% coverageUrsula Damani • 13 words • 0.0% coverageUrsula Damani • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageStefan Goldberg • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ursula Damani

41%flagged-word coverage
122 attributed words85% of attributed speech28% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.