Topic summary
52% 8 analyzed articles/videos 2,783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Development results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 2,174 hits . Analysis detected 19,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,891 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (13,509 of 16,562 topics). This Development is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group. Development
Topic details
Total words: 23,891
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles23.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst