Author summary
48% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,096 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Ekonde results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 770 hits . Analysis detected 3,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,357 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,991 of 6,628 authors). This Daniel Ekonde is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Daniel Ekonde
Author details
Total words: 6,357
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Special Pleading: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst