Author summary
62% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,660 analyzed words
BS Summary: These C.J. Polychroniou results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 1,348 hits . Analysis detected 11,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,571 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,716 of 6,630 authors). This C.J. Polychroniou is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. C.J. Polychroniou
Author details
Total words: 11,571
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst