Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Stephanie Riegel results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 172 hits. Analysis detected 1,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,242 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Stephanie Riegel is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Stephanie Riegel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Stephanie Riegel (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,242
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos