McGlinchey Stafford art auctioned off as shuttered law firm continues liquidating assets 33%

By Stephanie Riegel0%

7/17/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 706 faulty-reasoning hits from 702 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (14,392 of 21,198 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the article peer group.

Nearly 75 works of art that once adorned the offices of McGlinchey Stafford were auctioned off Thursday, as the former law firm, which dissolved early this year after half a century in business, liquidates its assets to settle more than $13 million in debts. 
The McGlinchey collection included dozens of oils, acrylics, and watercolors from some of the best-known Southern artists of the 20th century, as well as statues, pottery and antiques, according to court records included in the firms Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing. 
Among the big-ticket items: an Ida Kohlmeyer oil, which sold for $55,000, and an Enrique Alferez sculpture that fetched $60,000  more than double what bankruptcy court documents had listed as the estimated value of the bronze work, entitled “Woman in a Huipil.” 
“We were real excited to see the interest in the pieces,” said Neal Auction Co. 
President Michelle Leckert. 
“It says a lot about the material.” 
Altogether, if the McGlinchey pieces sold for their maximum estimated value they would fetch about $156,000 for the bankruptcy estate. 
That's a tiny fraction of what the firm owes banks, landlords, vendors and former employees. 
Still, the auction provided a window into the world of the one-time powerhouse firm, which had 17 offices in 11 states and 150 attorneys at the time of its shutdown, and was involved in some of the region’s most significant cases for decades. 
Neither the firm nor the attorney representing the bankruptcy trustee responded to requests for comment. 
Wind down process 
McGlinchey Stafford stunned the local legal community in January by announcing that its equity members, a group of senior attorneys who owned the firm, had voted to dissolve. 
A variety of factors contributed to the decision, including departures of several high-profile attorneys, delinquent collections, internal disagreements and steep costs in far flung offices. 
In February, the firm filed for Chapter 7 in the U.S. 
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. 
Court records filed at the time show the firm’s liabilities topped $13 million and included more than $2.5 million in bank debt, $6.5 million in office rent and more than $1.5 million in wage claims to employees. 
Its $15.5 million in assets, though greater than its liabilities, included more than $9.4 million in accounts receivables or bills for services that have not yet been paid. 
In the months since the filing, the court-appointed trustee overseeing the liquidation of firm assets, Metairie attorney Wilbur “Bill” Babin, has been working with experts to locate and secure client files, clean out offices and negotiate with creditors, including banks and landlords, court documents show. 
The process could take months or years. 
Support of Southern artists 
Many of the pieces in the collection, which moved with the firm in 2008 to the Pan American Life Building on Poydras Street, were purchased during that era, according to Neal Auction Co. 
Director of Fine Art Marney Robinson. 
The McGlinchey works, 74 lots in all, were among 365 pieces from a variety of private estates and institutional sources included in the auction, which featured Mid Century, Modern and Contemporary Art & Design. 
An oil painting by George Schmidt, “Occulus of the Pantheon,” had garnered 14 bids as of Thursday afternoon. 
The bidders had run up the price of the piece, estimated to be worth between $3,000 and $5,000 in court documents, to $7,500. 
Most of the other works, including drawings and framed photographs, had more modest price tags, ranging from a few hundred dollars to around $1,000. 
Ahead of the live bidding Thursday, Leckert said it was difficult to predict how much any of the works, whether from McGlinchey or any of the other sources, would bring in. 
Online bidding for the pieces opened three weeks ago, and hundreds of art collectors and interested buyers from around the world had already started bidding before the live auction began. 
“But the majority of the activity happens when the live auction opens,” Leckert said. 
“So, while there is a lot of advanced bidding, at any given moments there are thousands of people online through these platforms watching. 
We never know what is going to happen.” 
Email Stephanie Riegel at stephanie.riegel@theadvocate.com. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.8%Stephanie Riegel: 1.8%nola.com: 2.4%Confirmation Bias10.8%This article: 6.1%Stephanie Riegel: 3.2%nola.com: 1.1%Anchoring Bias6.1%This article: 8.0%Stephanie Riegel: 3.5%nola.com: 2.6%Availability Heuristic8.0%This article: 10.5%Stephanie Riegel: 3.4%nola.com: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic10.5%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Stephanie Riegel: 1.3%nola.com: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias4.4%This article: 6.3%Stephanie Riegel: 3.3%nola.com: 4.5%Framing Effect6.3%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.1%Stephanie Riegel: 3.6%nola.com: 3.8%Optimism Bias1.1%This article: 4.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.8%nola.com: 1.8%Pessimism Bias4.0%This article: 9.5%Stephanie Riegel: 2.6%nola.com: 3.5%Negativity Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 1.2%nola.com: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Stephanie Riegel: 4.1%nola.com: 2.7%Halo Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Stephanie Riegel: 1.0%nola.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 3.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.9%nola.com: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.1%Stephanie Riegel: 0.9%nola.com: 2.4%Hasty Generalization2.1%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.3%Stephanie Riegel: 0.7%nola.com: 0.3%Bandwagon4.3%This article: 4.0%Stephanie Riegel: 2.1%nola.com: 3.4%Appeal to Emotion4.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.4%nola.com: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.7%nola.com: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.9%nola.com: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.1%Stephanie Riegel: 1.7%nola.com: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.1%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.1%Stephanie Riegel: 1.1%nola.com: 2.1%Unattributed Quote2.1%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.0%Stephanie Riegel: 1.5%nola.com: 2.4%Biased Writer Voice5.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Riegel: 0.0%nola.com: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Stephanie Riegel: 0.5%nola.com: 1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.8%

702 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers26%attributed speech517writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageNeal Auction Co • 15 words • 100.0% coverageMichelle Leckert • 3 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Leckert • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWilbur “Bill” Babin • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageNeal Auction Co • 33 words • 0.0% coverageMarney Robinson • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Leckert • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Leckert • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Leckert • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Leckert • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Neal Auction Co

100%flagged-word coverage
48 attributed words26% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Unattributed Quote+31.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Neal Auction Co: 31.3%31.3%Attempt to Sell a Product +30.3 ptsWriter: 1.0%Neal Auction Co: 31.3%31.3%Biased Writer Voice-5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%Neal Auction Co: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.