Topic summary
⁠28%5 analyzed articles/videos1,913 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bankruptcy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 968 hits. Analysis detected 10,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,428 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (14,169 of 15,620 topics). This Bankruptcy is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
Bankruptcy
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751009.3% percentile
1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos