CBC Radio48%

More Canadians are struggling with debt. But there is help available 20%

By Padraig Moran0%

5/23/2026, 8:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 1,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,161 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.2% and a BS Rank of 20% (17,107 of 21,164 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the article peer group.

When Sean Picard couldn’t pay back almost $30,000 he owed on his credit card, he didn’t know where to turn for help  and spent years trying to just ignore the problem. 
“I was basically just throwing money at interest, where it wasn't going down. 
I was  avoiding calls from the bank, trying to just make the problem go away,” said Picard, 41, a retail worker in Toronto. 
“You always have that concern in the back of your head  it gets a little daunting trying to push that to one side in order to, I don't know, make it day-to-day,” he told The Current. 
Picard said he got his first credit card as a student, with a limit that kept going up as the years passed. 
Debt became a problem about 15 years ago, when he was earning about $50,000 but overspending and using his credit card to pick up the tab. 
He said a “lack of discipline” meant that he “didn't really think of the consequences of that down the road.” 
He realized he needed help about eight years ago, but wasn’t sure where to turn, or what information he could trust. 
“When you go down rabbit holes on the internet, you see some things that may seem too good to be true or some things just don't seem right,” he said. 
He felt particularly isolated and uncertain because “none of my friends  had gone through what I was experiencing  or at least weren't sharing what they were going through.” 
Debt doesn't discriminate  it will come for anybody who's not paying attention 
- Stacy Yanchuk Oleksy 
Picard isn’t the only Canadian dealing with debt right now. 
More than 37,000 people filed for insolvency in Canada in the first three months of 2026, the highest number of consumer insolvencies since 2009, during the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis. 
Stacy Yanchuk Oleksy, a certified financial counsellor, said Canadians are facing a “perfect storm” of high housing costs, lingering pandemic-related inflation, the Trump administration's trade war and now soaring gas prices arising from the U.S.-Israel war on Iran. 
“We've been frogs boiling to death in the water for a while,” said Yanchuk Oleksy, CEO of Money Mentors, a non-profit credit counselling agency in Alberta. 
“Debt doesn't discriminate  it will come for anybody who's not paying attention.” 
'It's about taking responsibility' 
Yanchuk Oleksy said her organization offers counselling and advice on debt management. 
They start by listening to a person’s story and then figuring out what options are available. 
That could include a plan and timeline to consolidate and repay debts to different creditors. 
Or setting up “a fireside chat with your creditors, to ask for lower interest or ask for a break while you do get help,” she said. 
“That's before the whole DIY options, right? 
Budgeting, going through your expenses and seeing what you can cut,” she said. 
She said for many people “it's not about the money, it's your relationship and perception of it,” especially if a bank or organization is offering what can feel like “free money” in the form of credit, or any kind of buy-now, pay-later arrangement. 
“What you have to ask is, can I pay it off in three months?” 
she said. 
“If I can't  maybe I need to save a little bit more, right? 
Because what feels easy right now will create a whole lot of problems down the road.” 
Yanchuk Oleksy said people struggling with debt shouldn’t let shame stop them from seeking help. 
“It's not entirely your fault; it's about taking responsibility. 
And so by giving us a call  you can make a better decision about your situation,” she said. 
'Slow burn' crisis could be coming 
Scott Terrio is a licensed insolvency trustee, a federally regulated position that guides people through bankruptcy proceedings, as well as an option called a consumer proposal. 
A consumer proposal is a legally binding process where a debtor and creditor agree terms. 
The proposal might involve paying just a percentage of the whole sum, or a timeline for repayment, or both. 
The terms are based on what the person in debt can afford. 
“A proposal is  a way out  where you're going from having no plan to having a plan,” said Terrio, manager of consumer insolvency at Hoyes, Michalos & Associates, a licensed insolvency trustee firm. 
Terrio advised Picard on this $30,000 credit card debt, after Picard reached out for help two years ago  six years after he first realized he had a problem. 
Picard said they worked out a five-year repayment plan, without any more interest accruing. 
“Instead of me throwing money at interest and never chipping away at the actual debt itself, I was now able to slowly make that less,” Picard said. 
“Every time I get a paycheck, it immediately goes out of my bank account so I don't even see it, don't have to think about it. 
It goes directly to the magic place where my debt goes down.” 
Terrio’s company charges for their services, but noted that many people see an immediate reduction in their monthly repayments once they commit to a plan. 
He added that roughly four out of ten people who contact them do not proceed with the options offered. 
“That's very normal  we don't want people to do something that isn't the optimum thing they can do for their situation. 
And everybody's different,” he said. 
Terrio said he used to primarily help renters who didn’t have assets to fall back on, but now it’s homeowners with well-paying jobs who are finding themselves in financial trouble. 
He thinks there’ll be a “slow burn” in the coming years, potentially worse than the 2009 crisis. 
“It's going to go up and then it's going to be a plateau and it's probably going to be two, three years,” he said. 
“When you take 140,000 or 150,000 or more Canadians filing in a year, times three or four years, that's way worse than a spike of two years, 15 years ago.” 
'Be brave enough' 
Two years into his five-year plan, Picard says he still struggles with the high costs of living in an expensive city like Toronto, but he’s doing much better these days. 
He’s living within his means, and is even managing to save a small bit for a rainy day. 
His mental well-being has also improved, he said. 
“I'm not scared to pick up the phone,” he said. 
“When someone's calling me, it's one of my loved ones, one of my friends.” 
His advice to other people struggling with debt would be to reach out and ask for help. 
“I was thinking about it for almost 10 years and I've only done it two years ago. 
If I had done it back then I would be far out of debt,” he said. 
“Be brave enough to take the first step.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.9%Padraig Moran: 2.1%CBC: 2.6%Confirmation Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.5%CBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Padraig Moran: 2.6%CBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic4.7%This article: 2.6%Padraig Moran: 0.7%CBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.6%This article: 3.1%Padraig Moran: 1.7%CBC: 0.9%Hindsight Bias3.1%This article: 4.2%Padraig Moran: 1.7%CBC: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias4.2%This article: 4.0%Padraig Moran: 2.3%CBC: 4.2%Framing Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 1.0%CBC: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.1%CBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Padraig Moran: 0.1%CBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect1.1%This article: 6.3%Padraig Moran: 1.8%CBC: 4.0%Optimism Bias6.3%This article: 7.8%Padraig Moran: 2.4%CBC: 1.4%Pessimism Bias7.8%This article: 3.2%Padraig Moran: 3.8%CBC: 5.6%Negativity Bias3.2%This article: 3.5%Padraig Moran: 2.9%CBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias3.5%This article: 3.7%Padraig Moran: 0.4%CBC: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error3.7%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.1%CBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.8%CBC: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.6%CBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Padraig Moran: 1.7%CBC: 3.7%Halo Effect1.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.1%CBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.6%CBC: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Padraig Moran: 0.4%CBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 1.2%CBC: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.1%CBC: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.9%Padraig Moran: 3.0%CBC: 3.7%Appeal to Authority6.9%This article: 2.2%Padraig Moran: 0.4%CBC: 1.3%False Dilemma2.2%This article: 3.4%Padraig Moran: 1.8%CBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope3.4%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.4%CBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.0%Padraig Moran: 4.0%CBC: 4.9%Hasty Generalization7.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.1%CBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.5%Padraig Moran: 4.9%CBC: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion8.5%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.9%CBC: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.9%Padraig Moran: 1.3%CBC: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.9%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.1%CBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.0%CBC: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.2%CBC: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.2%Padraig Moran: 1.9%CBC: 3.3%Anecdotal5.2%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.1%CBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.5%Padraig Moran: 1.1%CBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.5%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.2%Padraig Moran: 0.2%CBC: 0.1%Middle Ground1.2%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.2%CBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.2%CBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.1%Padraig Moran: 0.7%CBC: 1.1%Unattributed Quote1.1%This article: 0.6%Padraig Moran: 0.6%CBC: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.6%This article: 0.4%Padraig Moran: 0.5%CBC: 4.8%Biased Writer Voice0.4%This article: 5.3%Padraig Moran: 1.7%CBC: 2.4%Indoctrination5.3%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 1.3%CBC: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Padraig Moran: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Padraig Moran: 1.3%CBC: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.8%

1161 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers76%attributed speech281writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 13 words • 100.0% coverageSean Picard • 24 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 37 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 20 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 21 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 30 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 30 words • 0.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 13 words • 0.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 38 words • 0.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 26 words • 0.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 26 words • 0.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 7 words • 100.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 13 words • 0.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 43 words • 0.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 14 words • 100.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 2 words • 0.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 14 words • 0.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 16 words • 0.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 15 words • 100.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 9 words • 0.0% coverageStacy Yanchuk Oleksy • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageScott Terrio • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 27 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 26 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageScott Terrio • 19 words • 0.0% coverageScott Terrio • 22 words • 0.0% coverageScott Terrio • 5 words • 0.0% coverageScott Terrio • 30 words • 0.0% coverageScott Terrio • 17 words • 0.0% coverageScott Terrio • 24 words • 0.0% coverageScott Terrio • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageSean Picard • 30 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 18 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 10 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 17 words • 100.0% coverageSean Picard • 17 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 16 words • 0.0% coverageSean Picard • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Stacy Yanchuk Oleksy

84%flagged-word coverage
284 attributed words32% of attributed speech38% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +2.0 ptsWriter: 8.9%Stacy Yanchuk Oleksy: 10.9%10.9%Indoctrination+7.7 ptsWriter: 2.5%Stacy Yanchuk Oleksy: 10.2%10.2%Quote-first Misdirection+2.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Stacy Yanchuk Oleksy: 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer Voice-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Stacy Yanchuk Oleksy: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.