Keyword summary
30% 13 analyzed articles/videos 8,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Toronto results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 4,651 hits . Analysis detected 37,062 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,995 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,392 of 36,912 keywords). This Toronto is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. Toronto
Keyword details
Total words: 50,995
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score13 analyzed articles51K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst