Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,409 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kelsey Adams results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 737 hits . Analysis detected 5,980 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,763 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (6,070 of 6,628 authors). This Kelsey Adams is better (less manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group. Kelsey Adams
Author details
Total words: 12,763
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst