Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video873 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bhaven Moorthy results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Indoctrination, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 1,567 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,619 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (1,783 of 6,297 authors). This Bhaven Moorthy is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Bhaven Moorthy
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠72%Bhaven Moorthy (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,619
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

72% percentile
025507510071.7% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 19.9%19.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 12.9%12.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 12.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos