Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,192 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Xavier Mesquita in Toronto results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 545 hits. Analysis detected 4,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,981 of 6,628 authors). This Xavier Mesquita in Toronto is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Xavier Mesquita in Toronto
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
55%Xavier Mesquita in Toronto (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,768
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510055.0% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos