Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Haavardsrud results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.5% saturation with 219 hits. Analysis detected 1,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 471 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 94% (429 of 6,628 authors). This Paul Haavardsrud is worse (more manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Paul Haavardsrud
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
94%Paul Haavardsrud (selected)9%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 471
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510093.5% percentile
8.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles471 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 40.5%40.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 46.5%46.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 24.2%24.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 15.9%15.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.9%5.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.6%6.6%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 46.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 40.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 24.2%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.5%Middle Ground: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos

How did Nike lose its grip?85%
CBC Radio49%By Paul Haavardsrud0%5/3/2026, 12:00:00 AM
Train dreams84%
CBC Radio49%By Paul Haavardsrud0%4/10/2026, 12:00:00 AM