Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Haavardsrud results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.5% saturation with 219 hits . Analysis detected 1,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 471 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 94% (429 of 6,628 authors). This Paul Haavardsrud is worse (more manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group. Paul Haavardsrud
Author details
Total words: 471
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.5% percentile 8.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles471 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 40.5% 40.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 46.5% 46.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 24.2% 24.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 15.9% 15.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.9% 5.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.6% 6.6% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.8% 10.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 46.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 40.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 24.2%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.5% Middle Ground: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Burden of Proof: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst