Keyword summary
34% 59 analyzed articles/videos 23,529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Queens results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 11,271 hits . Analysis detected 86,991 faulty-reasoning hits from 121,230 analyzed words across 59 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (35,488 of 37,343 keywords). This Queens is better (less manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group. Queens
Keyword details
Total words: 121,230
Article count: 59
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score59 analyzed articles121.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst