Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video170 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ursula Damani results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 36.1% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 249.927 faulty-reasoning hits from 170 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,778 of 28,364 speakers). This Ursula Damani is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Ursula Damani
Speaker details
Total words: 170
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.8% percentile
25.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos170 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.8%15.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos