Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Private Club results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 390 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,653 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Private Club is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Private Club
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,653
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 1.9%1.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos