Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,072 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public-Safety results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 740 hits. Analysis detected 6,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,088 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 68% (4,993 of 15,447 topics). This Public-Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.9%14.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate