Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,072 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public-Safety results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 740 hits . Analysis detected 6,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,088 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 68% (4,993 of 15,447 topics). This Public-Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group. Public-Safety
Topic details
Total words: 4,088
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.7% percentile 4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTVU 71% 7/21/2026, 10:34:13 PM