Author summary
52% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angelina Hicks results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 805 hits . Analysis detected 4,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,423 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,547 of 6,204 authors). This Angelina Hicks is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. Angelina Hicks
Author details
Total words: 6,423
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.5% 12.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst