Publication summary
75% 17 analyzed articles/videos 11,017 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voice of OC results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 4,206 hits . Analysis detected 39,478 faulty-reasoning hits from 47,035 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 43% (238 of 410 publications). This Voice of OC is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 47,035
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score17 analyzed articles47K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst