Author summary
77% 1 analyzed article/video 909 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ayn Craciun results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Availability Heuristic , and Indoctrination , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 246 hits . Analysis detected 2,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,727 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,580 of 6,628 authors). This Ayn Craciun is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. Ayn Craciun
Author details
Total words: 2,727
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.0%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst