Publication summary
74%8 analyzed articles/videos5,791 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voice of OC results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 2,374 hits. Analysis detected 21,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,889 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 45% (209 of 379 publications). This Voice of OC is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Voice of OC
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
2%Berkeleyside1%
45%Voice of OC (selected)2%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

45% percentile
025507510045.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles23.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate