Author summary
95% 1 analyzed article/video 1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Duran results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 691 hits . Analysis detected 6,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,621 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 87% (870 of 6,376 authors). This David Duran is worse (more manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group. David Duran
Author details
Total words: 3,621
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.4% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 11.2% 11.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 13.3% 13.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.5% 18.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.8% 5.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.4%, sitewide 15.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 13.3%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 11.8%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Author 11.2%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst