Author summary
55% 1 analyzed article/video 901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle King results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 147 hits . Analysis detected 1,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,703 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,911 of 6,603 authors). This Michelle King is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Michelle King
Author details
Total words: 2,703
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.9% 2.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst