Author summary
81% 1 analyzed article/video 1,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hosam Elattar results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 633 hits . Analysis detected 4,417 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,407 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,948 of 6,362 authors). This Hosam Elattar is worse (more manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group. Hosam Elattar
Author details
Total words: 4,407
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.4% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.4% 14.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.7% 11.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.2% 12.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst