Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Werth results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 132 hits . Analysis detected 912 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,608 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,031 of 6,350 authors). This Christopher Werth is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group. Christopher Werth
Author details
Total words: 1,608
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.3% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst