Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Werth results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 912 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,608 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,031 of 6,350 authors). This Christopher Werth is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Christopher Werth
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
53%Christopher Werth (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,608
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.4%6.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos