RedState91%

Harmeet Strikes Immediately: DOJ Probe Launched After NJ Admits Allowing 400 Non-Citizens to Vote 69%

By Rusty Weiss90%

7/21/2026, 12:58:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 2,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 673 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (6,852 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the article peer group.

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon is wasting no time. 
Hours after New Jersey Gov. 
Mikie Sherrill (D) publicly admitted that a software error had allowed nearly 400 non-citizens to actually cast ballots in the state, Dhillon fired off a formal letter launching a federal probe and demanding detailed records on the roughly 6,600 erroneously registered non-citizens—as well as specific voting information for those who cast ballots. 
She called the revelation "unacceptable and illegal," while giving the state just five business days to respond. 
"Ensuring that U.S. citizens’ votes are not illegally diluted by noncitizens’ votes is of paramount importance," Dhillon wrote. 
"We therefore write to formally request additional information to assess New Jersey’s compliance with various federal statutes ..." 
Dhillon is asking the state to hand over the full names, dates of birth, nationalities, addresses, and registration details for the roughly 6,600 non-citizens who were wrongly added to the voter rolls. 
She also wants the specific voting records for the approximately 400 of them who actually cast ballots—including when and where they voted, plus any mail-in certifications or signatures if applicable. 
She warned Sherrill to "please treat this correspondence as a request to preserve any and all records relating to today’s disclosure." 
Sherrill publicly acknowledged on Tuesday that a software error in the state’s Motor Vehicle Commission system had erroneously registered thousands of non-citizens to vote between June 2023 and June 2024. 
Sherrill, who took office this year, blamed the error on the previous administration of Gov. 
Phil Murphy (D) and said a preliminary review showed that fewer than 400 of those individuals actually cast ballots. 
As if that is somehow acceptable. 
"These individuals answered 'no' when asked on a keypad whether they were a U.S. citizen when applying for drivers' licenses and identification cards, but through no fault of their own, the system registered them anyway," she explained in a lengthy post on X. 
Oopsie. 
As RedState's Teri Christoph wrote, "Darn those crazy software glitches! 
Weird how they always seem to default to registering non-citizens, isn't it?" 
Indeed, the errors and the glitches rarely seem to throw a boost to voters who lean Republican. 
And, while Sherrill wants you to know that this crazy mishap was not the fault of the non-citizens who were just innocent collateral damage as a result of this glitch, the nearly 400 people who proceeded to vote anyway bear real responsibility. 
Earlier this month, Dhillon announced that the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division would be sending federal election monitors to six states for the 2026 primaries. 
She proceeded to warn election officials that they could face criminal prosecution for allowing noncitizens to remain on voter rolls or cast ballots. 
Perhaps the best part of all this is watching Democrats, who just spent the past few days denying evidence of election fraud laid out by President Trump, even going so far as to mock him, now have to sit here and downplay a tangible example of what he's talking about. 
It took all of five days for a Democrat to inadvertently make the case in favor of the SAVE America Act. 
Under the Act, new or updated registrations tied to DMV interactions would require affirmative proof of citizenship rather than relying solely on self-attestation or automated systems. 
This front-end check could have blocked the erroneous registrations before they happened. 
The bill also pushes for better DHS cross-checks on voter rolls, which could have flagged and removed non-citizens after the fact. 
And voilà!—Sherrill will never again have to come before the public to explain why non-citizens are casting ballots in her state's elections. 
Everyone's a winner. 
Especially Americans who'd like to know that their legal vote matters. 
Editor's Note: The Democrats are doing everything in their power to undermine the integrity of our elections. 
Help us tell the truth about the SAVE America Act and how it will prevent voter fraud. 
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.8%Rusty Weiss: 9.6%RedState: 7.0%Confirmation Bias12.8%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.7%RedState: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Rusty Weiss: 3.9%RedState: 3.4%Availability Heuristic1.8%This article: 1.8%Rusty Weiss: 0.8%RedState: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic1.8%This article: 9.2%Rusty Weiss: 0.8%RedState: 0.9%Hindsight Bias9.2%This article: 1.8%Rusty Weiss: 1.2%RedState: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias1.8%This article: 4.8%Rusty Weiss: 13.0%RedState: 9.2%Framing Effect4.8%This article: 6.4%Rusty Weiss: 0.5%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion6.4%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.4%RedState: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.4%RedState: 1.7%Optimism Bias7.0%This article: 0.9%Rusty Weiss: 2.0%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.9%This article: 29.3%Rusty Weiss: 19.8%RedState: 13.9%Negativity Bias29.3%This article: 6.2%Rusty Weiss: 1.9%RedState: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias6.2%This article: 8.5%Rusty Weiss: 2.2%RedState: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error8.5%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.1%RedState: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%Rusty Weiss: 4.5%RedState: 4.7%In-Group Bias14.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 2.5%RedState: 3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 1.0%RedState: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.8%RedState: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.1%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.9%Rusty Weiss: 1.5%RedState: 1.2%Recency Bias11.9%This article: 10.8%Rusty Weiss: 0.9%RedState: 0.5%Primacy Effect10.8%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Rusty Weiss: 10.0%RedState: 6.9%Ad Hominem10.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 2.3%RedState: 2.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.4%Rusty Weiss: 3.4%RedState: 3.3%Appeal to Authority3.4%This article: 6.2%Rusty Weiss: 2.7%RedState: 2.4%False Dilemma6.2%This article: 5.1%Rusty Weiss: 1.9%RedState: 1.4%Slippery Slope5.1%This article: 2.5%Rusty Weiss: 0.1%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning2.5%This article: 18.0%Rusty Weiss: 9.6%RedState: 10.1%Hasty Generalization18.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 1.3%RedState: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.4%Rusty Weiss: 1.5%RedState: 0.9%Bandwagon0.4%This article: 7.4%Rusty Weiss: 9.3%RedState: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion7.4%This article: 2.1%Rusty Weiss: 2.1%RedState: 1.8%Begging the Question2.1%This article: 14.4%Rusty Weiss: 4.9%RedState: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.4%This article: 9.7%Rusty Weiss: 3.1%RedState: 0.9%Tu Quoque9.7%This article: 19.5%Rusty Weiss: 2.5%RedState: 1.2%Burden of Proof19.5%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.1%RedState: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.4%RedState: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 1.5%Rusty Weiss: 2.0%RedState: 2.6%Anecdotal1.5%This article: 6.2%Rusty Weiss: 0.1%RedState: 0.3%No True Scotsman6.2%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 1.8%RedState: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.9%Rusty Weiss: 0.1%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.9%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.3%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 6.4%Rusty Weiss: 0.7%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy6.4%This article: 12.0%Rusty Weiss: 3.8%RedState: 2.4%Unattributed Quote12.0%This article: 2.5%Rusty Weiss: 2.3%RedState: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection2.5%This article: 25.9%Rusty Weiss: 24.5%RedState: 21.5%Biased Writer Voice25.9%This article: 5.1%Rusty Weiss: 4.5%RedState: 4.8%Indoctrination5.1%This article: 0.0%Rusty Weiss: 0.3%RedState: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 28.5%Rusty Weiss: 14.5%RedState: 15.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias28.5%This article: 7.3%Rusty Weiss: 4.2%RedState: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.3%

673 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers8.6%attributed speech615writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coveragePhil Murphy • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageRedState VIP • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Phil Murphy

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words74% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+93.8 ptsWriter: 6.2%Phil Murphy: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning -31.2 ptsWriter: 31.2%Phil Murphy: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-28.3 ptsWriter: 28.3%Phil Murphy: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%Phil Murphy: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%Phil Murphy: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%Phil Murphy: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.