Keyword summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Election Monitors results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 614 hits. Analysis detected 3,943 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,019 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (7,087 of 37,536 keywords). This Federal Election Monitors is worse (more manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
Federal Election Monitors
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,019
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

81% percentile
025507510081.1% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 28.8%28.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 30.4%30.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.4%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 28.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Tu Quoque: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos