Topic summary
⁠97%2 analyzed articles/videos673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doj Investigation results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 51.5% saturation with 2,169 hits. Analysis detected 11,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,209 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,527 of 16,562 topics). This Doj Investigation is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
Doj Investigation
Topic details
Total words: 4,209
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.7% percentile
6.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 51.5%51.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 29.1%29.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 24.0%24.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 24.6%24.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.6%16.6%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 51.5%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 29.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Horn Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 1.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos