Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,434 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Save-America-Act results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 951 hits . Analysis detected 6,666 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,596 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (22,826 of 35,112 keywords). This Save-America-Act is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group. Save-America-Act
Keyword details
Total words: 7,596
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst