Author summary
⁠54%5 analyzed articles/videos2,782 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Rondeau results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,285 hits. Analysis detected 14,302 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,273 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (3,695 of 6,382 authors). This Olivia Rondeau is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Olivia Rondeau
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠43%Olivia Rondeau (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,273
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 7.6%7.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos