BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 296 faulty-reasoning hits from 184 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,056 of 20,409 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump has signed a presidential memorandum aimed at strengthening Americans’ right to repair their own vehicles using aftermarket parts. 
On Monday, from the Oval Office, the president noted that the directive orders federal agencies to examine ways to protect consumer choice, lower repair costs and support independent repair shops. 
This memo serves as an expansion of the administration’s broader “right-to-repair” push, following a crucial regulatory shift for the agricultural sector in February. 
In that instance, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a formal clarification preventing equipment manufacturers from weaponizing the Clean Air Act to restrict farmers from servicing their own tractors and machinery. 
Following the signing, Trump was asked about Monday’s Supreme Court ruling allowing states to count mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day but arrived afterward. 
He called the decision disappointing, arguing that it could increase the risk of election fraud, and said it made passage of the SAVE America Act even more important. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.5%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 3.1%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias12.5%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 3.8%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 16.8%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 27.2%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect16.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.2%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 3.8%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias15.2%This article: 32.1%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 11.8%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias32.1%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 4.2%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 7.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 15.2%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 3.8%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization15.2%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 15.2%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 3.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon15.2%This article: 16.8%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 12.2%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion16.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 12.5%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 3.1%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.5%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 15.2%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 11.1%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice15.2%This article: 1.1%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 2.3%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination1.1%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 3.8%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%OAN Staff Taylor Tinsley: 7.6%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…8.2%

184 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker15%attributed speech156writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words100% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Trump: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -9.6 ptsWriter: 9.6%Trump: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.3 ptsWriter: 1.3%Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.