Topic summary
⁠25%5 analyzed articles/videos4,344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Right To Repair results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,805 hits. Analysis detected 11,073 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,194 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (14,733 of 16,562 topics). This Right To Repair is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Right To Repair
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510011.0% percentile
1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.3%11.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos