Author summary
37% 5 analyzed articles/videos 468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Booth results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,125 hits . Analysis detected 7,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,293 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (4,948 of 6,244 authors). This Michael Booth is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group. Michael Booth
Author details
Total words: 10,293
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst