Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vittoria Elliott results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 763 hits . Analysis detected 3,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,458 of 6,316 authors). This Vittoria Elliott is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group. Vittoria Elliott
Author details
Total words: 2,560
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.9% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 29.8% 29.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 22.7% 22.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.6% 10.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.1% 7.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 29.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 22.7%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.1%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst