Author summary
15% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew P. Collins results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,284 hits . Analysis detected 9,089 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,350 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,124 of 6,359 authors). This Andrew P. Collins is better (less manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group. Andrew P. Collins
Author details
Total words: 13,350
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.6% 9.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst