Author summary
15%4 analyzed articles/videos3,663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew P. Collins results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,284 hits. Analysis detected 9,089 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,350 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,124 of 6,359 authors). This Andrew P. Collins is better (less manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Andrew P. Collins
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
20%Andrew P. Collins (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,350
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

19% percentile
025507510019.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.6%9.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate