Publication summary
32% 49 analyzed articles/videos 24,396 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Drive results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 13,931 hits . Analysis detected 107,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 127,189 analyzed words across 49 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 36% (255 of 398 publications). This The Drive is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 127,189
Article count: 49
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score49 analyzed articles127.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst