Author summary
61% 14 analyzed articles/videos 5,688 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Ismail results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 4,640 hits . Analysis detected 34,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,878 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,802 of 6,348 authors). This Adam Ismail is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group. Adam Ismail
Author details
Total words: 29,878
Article count: 14
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score14 analyzed articles29.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.5% 15.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.2% 5.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst