The Drive37%

Toyota’s Secret Mid-Engine Sports Car With Yaris Lights Is Buzzing Around Fuji 63%

By Adam Ismail58%

7/22/2026, 3:29:18 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anchoring Bias, and Recency Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 95 hits. Analysis detected 658 faulty-reasoning hits from 408 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (8,092 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the article peer group.

Toyota has been teasing a new MR2 for what feels like ages now. 
On the road to the sports car’s eventual revival, the company’s top engineers took a GR Yaris and shifted its motor behind the driver’s seat, in Renault Clio V6-fashion. 
That mule looked great , but it’s got nothing on this test car recently caught blazing around Fuji Speedway, that hopefully teases what the company has in mind for the final product. 
In these photos and short video embedded below, courtesy of X user @You_SuiKoyoAZ , we can see a compact coupe with big vents behind the doors and prominent box flares. 
The headlights and taillights look like GR Yaris units, further cementing that relationship. 
Yeah, it’s got a “built-in-a-shed” vibe to it, but it still looks perfect. 
If Toyota literally put this on sale tomorrow, I wouldn’t mind. 
In the video specifically, the exhaust note you’re hearing belongs not to the G16E-GTS three-cylinder found in the production GR Yaris and GR Corolla, but a new, 2.0-liter four-cylinder, expected to pump out about 400 horsepower. 
This is the same mill Toyota’s been testing in what it calls “Concept M,” that aforementioned, mid-engine GR Yaris development car. 
@You_SuiKoyoAZ via X 
Also like Toyota’s rally machines, the MR2 is expected to route that power to all four wheels. 
Gazoo Racing engineering chief Naohiko Saito recently told the U.K.’s Auto Express that such a layout is “new” for the company, combining a midship engine with all-wheel drive, but that the team discovered in initial testing that such a pairing “offers the best layout for high-performance driving.” 
走行動画 pic.twitter.com/5LxZVE7FCC 
- ∬なのぽよ∬ 𝙉𝙚𝙭𝙩→? 
(@You_SuiKoyoAZ) July 22, 2026 
If the GR crew’s recent history is anything to go on, it’s very likely that we see this evolved form of the Concept M compete on the circuit (or rally stage ), and maybe enjoy a camouflaged public showing or two before we see the final MR2 with the cover pulled off. 
And that’s awesome—it’s been exciting to see Toyota develop these cars out in the open, showing all the while that they’re not vague concepts, but vehicles being honed and validated through motorsport. 
That’s the way it should be. 
Got a tip about the new Toyota MR2? 
Reach out to tips@thedrive.com 
The post Toyota’s Secret Mid-Engine Sports Car With Yaris Lights Is Buzzing Around Fuji appeared first on The Drive . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.2%Adam Ismail: 4.9%The Drive: 3.0%Confirmation Bias4.2%This article: 12.7%Adam Ismail: 1.8%The Drive: 1.1%Anchoring Bias12.7%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 4.0%The Drive: 4.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.2%Adam Ismail: 1.6%The Drive: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic3.2%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.9%The Drive: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Adam Ismail: 2.3%The Drive: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias8.8%This article: 7.1%Adam Ismail: 5.8%The Drive: 4.6%Framing Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 1.2%The Drive: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.6%The Drive: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.2%The Drive: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 23.3%Adam Ismail: 4.7%The Drive: 3.6%Optimism Bias23.3%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 2.8%The Drive: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 9.1%The Drive: 6.7%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Adam Ismail: 2.5%The Drive: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias10.5%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.4%The Drive: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.3%The Drive: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.5%The Drive: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.1%The Drive: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Adam Ismail: 3.4%The Drive: 2.6%Halo Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.1%The Drive: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.7%Adam Ismail: 2.2%The Drive: 1.3%Recency Bias12.7%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.4%The Drive: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.3%The Drive: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.2%The Drive: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.3%The Drive: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.5%Adam Ismail: 4.9%The Drive: 3.4%Appeal to Authority11.5%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 2.2%The Drive: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 1.1%The Drive: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.2%The Drive: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.7%Adam Ismail: 8.1%The Drive: 6.6%Hasty Generalization12.7%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.2%The Drive: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 1.7%The Drive: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 6.4%The Drive: 3.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 1.3%The Drive: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 2.0%The Drive: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.5%The Drive: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.4%The Drive: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.2%The Drive: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.8%Adam Ismail: 3.9%The Drive: 3.5%Anecdotal7.8%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.1%The Drive: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.8%Adam Ismail: 2.6%The Drive: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.8%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.3%The Drive: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.3%The Drive: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 1.0%The Drive: 0.4%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.5%Adam Ismail: 2.4%The Drive: 2.1%Unattributed Quote11.5%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 1.2%The Drive: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 21.6%Adam Ismail: 15.0%The Drive: 11.3%Biased Writer Voice21.6%This article: 1.5%Adam Ismail: 1.5%The Drive: 1.4%Indoctrination1.5%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.2%The Drive: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Adam Ismail: 2.0%The Drive: 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

408 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker12%attributed speech361writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageNaohiko Saito • 47 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Naohiko Saito

100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words100% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Naohiko Saito: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-24.4 ptsWriter: 24.4%Naohiko Saito: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Naohiko Saito: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.