Author summary
32%6 analyzed articles/videos4,628 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jerry Perez results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 2,234 hits. Analysis detected 14,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,749 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,758 of 6,315 authors). This Jerry Perez is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Jerry Perez
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
25%Jerry Perez (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 17,749
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

25% percentile
025507510024.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles17.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.6%12.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate