The Drive37%

Next-Gen Honda Ridgeline First Peek: It Looks a Lot More Like a Truck 88%

By Caleb Jacobs57%

7/23/2026, 4:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 51.2% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 826 faulty-reasoning hits from 373 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 80.3% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,764 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 87.40% of the article peer group.

The Honda Ridgeline might be the internet’s favorite truck to hate on, but that doesn’t mean it’s a bad pickup . 
If anything, it’s just old, as the current generation has been around for 10 years. 
Honda knows this, which is why it confirmed on Thursday that a new and more rugged model is on the way “within two years.” 
And it looks pretty darn boxy. 
Even though you’ll have to hold tight for a while, I have a hunch it’ll be worth it. 
Honda is designing the new Ridgeline at its Southern California styling studio, and judging by the shadowy teaser photo that I brightened up in Photoshop, it’ll look decidedly more truck-like than the existing model. 
It has a strong jawline thanks to a front bumper that’s mostly straight up-and-down; it sits up higher with tall all-terrain tires; and the design team has chosen not to smooth the bed break line, although it’s sure to retain its unibody construction. 
In addition to styling the truck in SoCal, Honda is engineering it in Ohio. 
Year after year, the Ridgeline is one of the most American-made vehicles—a trend that will seemingly continue on. 
Honda is staying tight-lipped on powertrain details for now, though you can’t help but assume it’ll borrow the new Passport ‘s 3.5-liter naturally aspirated V6, maybe with hybrid assist . 
I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Ridgeline adopt a lot more from the Passport, really. 
And why wouldn’t it? 
Honda did a stellar job with the new SUV, in both my opinion and that of those who have driven it for thousands of miles . 
Plus, the existing Ridgeline already rides on the last-gen Passport platform, and the next one will still be built at the Honda Alabama Auto Plant. 
Honda confirmed that Ridgeline production will pause later this year so it can prepare to build the new one. 
This lines up with a previous report saying the midsize pickup would go away for 18 months. 
When it comes back, it’ll be interesting to see how much Honda caters to the contemporary truck crowd. 
Surely, a good middle ground exists. 
I hope Honda can find it. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.7%Caleb Jacobs: 3.0%The Drive: 3.0%Confirmation Bias13.7%This article: 8.0%Caleb Jacobs: 1.4%The Drive: 1.1%Anchoring Bias8.0%This article: 13.9%Caleb Jacobs: 6.5%The Drive: 4.0%Availability Heuristic13.9%This article: 24.7%Caleb Jacobs: 2.1%The Drive: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic24.7%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.8%The Drive: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Caleb Jacobs: 3.5%The Drive: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias8.0%This article: 3.5%Caleb Jacobs: 3.5%The Drive: 4.6%Framing Effect3.5%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.8%The Drive: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.6%Caleb Jacobs: 1.0%The Drive: 0.7%Status Quo Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.5%Caleb Jacobs: 4.6%The Drive: 3.6%Optimism Bias15.5%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 1.9%The Drive: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Caleb Jacobs: 7.5%The Drive: 6.7%Negativity Bias5.6%This article: 7.0%Caleb Jacobs: 2.1%The Drive: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.7%The Drive: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 1.6%The Drive: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.6%The Drive: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Caleb Jacobs: 4.6%The Drive: 2.6%Halo Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.8%Caleb Jacobs: 1.9%The Drive: 1.3%Recency Bias4.8%This article: 1.1%Caleb Jacobs: 0.8%The Drive: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.1%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.4%The Drive: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.4%The Drive: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.5%The Drive: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 4.7%The Drive: 3.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 1.6%Caleb Jacobs: 1.8%The Drive: 1.9%False Dilemma1.6%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.3%The Drive: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.3%The Drive: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.8%Caleb Jacobs: 10.2%The Drive: 6.6%Hasty Generalization4.8%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.1%The Drive: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.6%Caleb Jacobs: 1.5%The Drive: 0.9%Bandwagon5.6%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 4.8%The Drive: 3.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 1.1%Caleb Jacobs: 1.3%The Drive: 0.7%Begging the Question1.1%This article: 6.7%Caleb Jacobs: 2.0%The Drive: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.7%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.7%The Drive: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.3%The Drive: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.6%The Drive: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.0%Caleb Jacobs: 4.8%The Drive: 3.5%Anecdotal7.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.2%The Drive: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.9%The Drive: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.8%Caleb Jacobs: 0.2%The Drive: 0.2%Middle Ground4.8%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.1%The Drive: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.7%The Drive: 0.4%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.0%Caleb Jacobs: 1.7%The Drive: 2.1%Unattributed Quote11.0%This article: 9.1%Caleb Jacobs: 0.8%The Drive: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection9.1%This article: 51.2%Caleb Jacobs: 23.9%The Drive: 11.3%Biased Writer Voice51.2%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 2.1%The Drive: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caleb Jacobs: 5.2%The Drive: 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

373 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker15%attributed speech316writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageHonda • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageHonda • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageHonda • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Honda

42%flagged-word coverage
57 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Biased Writer Voice-60.4 ptsWriter: 60.4%Honda: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+36.7 ptsWriter: 5.4%Honda: 42.1%42.1%Quote-first Misdirection-10.8 ptsWriter: 10.8%Honda: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.