The Drive37%

How The Wrong Car Cover Can Cause Rust 54%

By Andrew P. Collins15%

7/13/2026, 2:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 51.8% saturation with 220 hits. Analysis detected 1,146 faulty-reasoning hits from 425 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.5% and a BS Rank of 54% (10,068 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the article peer group.

Just a quick PSA for those of you who park outside and put your cars under a cover—the wrong one for your climate can actually be a lot worse than nothing at all. 
I accidentally turned my old International Scout into a little sauna for a few days—not something I want any of you to experience! 
Last winter, I kept my old Scout in a barn under a weighted blanket-style cover from CoverSeal. 
Its main purpose is to prevent mice from crawling into the vehicle. 
A heavy skirt around the outside effectively holds the cover to the ground, eliminating the need for straps. 
It worked great indoors and kept the critters out. 
This summer, I’ve been parking the truck next to my house. 
I’ve been working on changing its real leaf springs (a job that got delayed due to me ordering the wrong parts, oops) so I threw the heavy CoverSeal cover on it before a big rain storm. 
If you’re going to use a tight-fitting cover, make sure moisture has a real lane to escape. 
Otherwise, this is who’s going to set up shop under your project car. 
Andrew P. 
Collins 
Well, it kept the top of the vehicle dry, but not the bottom. 
The weighted skirt that seemed to keep mice away couldn’t stop rainwater from sneaking in, causing the area under the truck to turn into a swamp. 
Quite the opposite of a healthy home for an old, rust-prone truck. 
Luckily, it hadn’t been sitting like that long, but jeeze, when I saw how mucky the dirt was under the truck, I was distressed to say the least. 
I was pretty surprised at how quickly the area under the sealed cover became a swamp. 
Like, I saw an actual toad hanging out with a worm down there. 
I guess they’re even more creative than mice when it comes to extreme ingress. 
Anyway, this experience is a great illustration of how differently different car covers behave, so I figured I’d share it with the class. 
This CoverSeal unit was great for indoor storage and rodent mitigation, but clearly does not exhaust moisture anywhere near quickly enough to be working outside in a New York summer. 
So when you’re car cover shopping, make sure you take some time to match the product with the environment you’ll be subjecting it to. 
Got a story tip? 
Drop us a line at tips@thedrive.com. 
The post How The Wrong Car Cover Can Cause Rust appeared first on The Drive . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 1.3%The Drive: 3.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.4%The Drive: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Andrew P. Collins: 2.9%The Drive: 4.0%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 5.4%Andrew P. Collins: 0.9%The Drive: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic5.4%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.2%The Drive: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Andrew P. Collins: 0.7%The Drive: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias3.3%This article: 9.6%Andrew P. Collins: 6.0%The Drive: 4.6%Framing Effect9.6%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.3%The Drive: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.8%The Drive: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.2%Andrew P. Collins: 2.5%The Drive: 3.6%Optimism Bias4.2%This article: 6.6%Andrew P. Collins: 2.5%The Drive: 2.0%Pessimism Bias6.6%This article: 35.5%Andrew P. Collins: 5.2%The Drive: 6.7%Negativity Bias35.5%This article: 8.5%Andrew P. Collins: 0.3%The Drive: 1.9%Self-Serving Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.9%The Drive: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 1.5%The Drive: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.5%The Drive: 2.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.8%Andrew P. Collins: 0.9%The Drive: 1.3%Recency Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.2%The Drive: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.3%The Drive: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.4%The Drive: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.8%Andrew P. Collins: 1.6%The Drive: 3.4%Appeal to Authority2.8%This article: 10.8%Andrew P. Collins: 1.9%The Drive: 1.9%False Dilemma10.8%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 2.1%The Drive: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.7%Andrew P. Collins: 4.2%The Drive: 6.6%Hasty Generalization16.7%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.3%The Drive: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 18.1%Andrew P. Collins: 3.3%The Drive: 3.9%Appeal to Emotion18.1%This article: 2.8%Andrew P. Collins: 0.1%The Drive: 0.7%Begging the Question2.8%This article: 14.6%Andrew P. Collins: 1.1%The Drive: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.6%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 9.6%Andrew P. Collins: 0.5%The Drive: 0.4%Burden of Proof9.6%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.1%The Drive: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 51.8%Andrew P. Collins: 4.7%The Drive: 3.5%Anecdotal51.8%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.8%Andrew P. Collins: 0.2%The Drive: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.8%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.2%The Drive: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.5%The Drive: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.4%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 1.3%The Drive: 2.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 1.0%The Drive: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.8%Andrew P. Collins: 9.6%The Drive: 11.3%Biased Writer Voice7.8%This article: 17.4%Andrew P. Collins: 4.0%The Drive: 1.4%Indoctrination17.4%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew P. Collins: 0.0%The Drive: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 32.2%Andrew P. Collins: 2.7%The Drive: 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…32.2%

425 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker5.2%attributed speech403writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageThe Drive • 6 words • 0.0% coverageThe Drive • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

The Drive

0%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words100% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -34.0 ptsWriter: 34.0%The Drive: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-18.4 ptsWriter: 18.4%The Drive: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.2 ptsWriter: 8.2%The Drive: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.