Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 870 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Fix results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 751 hits . Analysis detected 3,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,446 of 6,316 authors). This Lauren Fix is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group. Lauren Fix
Author details
Total words: 3,480
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.6% 21.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst