Author summary
87% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brianna Lyman results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 4,711 hits . Analysis detected 39,111 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,153 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,762 of 6,170 authors). This Brianna Lyman is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group. Brianna Lyman
Author details
Total words: 20,153
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.5% percentile 3.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles20.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.4% 23.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 18.5% 18.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.9% 13.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.5% 12.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.3% 14.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 18.5%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst